I hope both of these questions are fairly straight forward... First, I have 4 IP addresses (x.x.x.11,12,13 and 14) on my ISPConfig machine. All sites and functions are currently on IP 11. I have one customer which I am concerned about possibly getting my IP on a spam list. Is there a way I can get ISPConfig to have all of their mail go out on .12 instead of .11 like all the other domains? I guess this would be similar to how you can select an IP address when adding a new site. Also, I am fighting with a little issue in getting emails to send from my server without getting caught in spam filters. I am to the point now where the emails will go out but in looking at the email headers when the emails are received it looks like something on my ISPConfig server is tagging the outbound emails with localhost/127.0.0.1 and not the FQDN of the server. I am not sure whether roundcubemail is doing this or postfix or amavis. Any ideas which program is causing this and which setting it might be? I followed the 'perfect ISPConfig3 for CentOS' install guide when I set the server up. A sample header file is below (with domain and IP replacements...). Domain1 is the sending domain, domain2 is the receiving domain. This receiving domain does receive mail now, another receiving domain still throws the email in a junk folder but does not show why in the the header info. Thanks, Brian Received: from spamfilter.domain2.com (x.x.x.x) by 'server FQDN...' (172.16.1.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:23:04 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1261506183-613900fe0000-cd5dBY X-Barracuda-URL: http://x.x.x.x:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from dev1.domain1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamfilter.domain2.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 20533CC53E for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:23:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from dev1.domain1.com (dev1.domain1.com [68.70.x.x]) by spamfilter.domain2.com with ESMTP id EEfuZio5AxQfehRZ for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:23:04 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: [email protected] Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by dev1.domain1.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33537D86BB for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:23:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from dev1.domain1.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dev1.domain1.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQHPkBHrHKnC for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:22:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from dev1.domain1.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dev1.domain1.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAE97D86BA for <[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:22:59 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:22:59 -0500 From: Name <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: asdf Subject: asdf Organization: Domain Reply-To: [email protected] Message-ID: <2572e160ffb4abd9a2ac06fc0a05d343@localhost> X-Sender: [email protected] User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Barracuda-Connect: dev1.domain1.com[68.70.x.x] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1261506184 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at domain2.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=5.0 KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.17787 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: [email protected]
This is more a postfix then ispconfig qestion. As far as I know, this is not supported by postfix. The localhost lines are from amavis and they are absolutely ok and common, they will not cause a spam tagging by external filters. As you see above, the barracuda filter has not tagged this email as spam. If other filters tag your emails as spam, then this msut have a different reason.
