Can Zulip and or Rocket.chat be installed on top of ISPConfig

Discussion in 'Technical' started by adamjedgar, Dec 3, 2019.

  1. adamjedgar

    adamjedgar Member

    I am considering providing a chat service to one of my clients.

    can we install either Zulip or Rocket.chat on top of ISPConfig?
     
  2. Steini86

    Steini86 Active Member

  3. adamjedgar

    adamjedgar Member

    ok cool.
    so does that mean that after installing ISPConfig (which i already have hosting email and websites, i could just follow the Zulip tutorial on howtoforge?)
     
  4. Steini86

    Steini86 Active Member

    No, unfortunately not.
    https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/stable/production/requirements.html
    You can:
    a) Install it manually (https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/stable/production/install-existing-server.html)
    b) Use Docker
    c) Use a dedicated VM for Zulip

    From what I see, zulip needs quite some ressources from your server and is designed for a lot of users. Is that really what your client wants/needs?

    Rocket.chat seems to be easier to integrate in ispconfig: https://www.niih.de/how-to-deploy-rocket-chat-within-a-few-minutes-on-a-ispconfig-server/
     
  5. adamjedgar

    adamjedgar Member

    i am not sure if it matters which one i offer the client.
    I dont have a brief as such, however, the client is a paragliding/hang gliding club. it has a committee of about 15 members that currently communicate and collaborate with each other via email.

    I just thought it would be nicer to provide a more organised method of facilitating that collaboration. So Rocket.chat and Zulip were the first 2 i looked at as Zulip is on one of the howtoforge tutorials. When i also looked at a youtube video about Zulip, it seemed to be the better of the 2.

    A rival club uses TinyHQ (I am not sure whether this other club is on the $34/month or $69/month plan)... i wanted to offer something as good as or better than that running on my server.

    My assumption was that ISPConfig would be a good fit because it "sits on top" of a configured system unlike some of the other control panels?
     

Share This Page