Hello. My request is about clamav. How about change from clamscan to clamdscan in clamassassin, becouse clamscan take all CPU power then load virus DB each time then the check email message.
My request to! Please use clamd in the next version. I have also problems with clamscan, clamd is fine and ok
Take a look here for now: http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13385&highlight=clamd+ispconfig http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12864&highlight=clamd+ispconfig
Falko i'am already using clamdscan - Clamscan use for every user a single process One process used 6% of CPU (Celeron 2800Mhz) I have more dan 300 Email accounts on my server, if example 15 users received a email then clamav startup 15 process * 6% CPU = 95% total CPU I'am not the only one, so my opinion is use clamd in the next update.
But the threads are about using clamd... Here's another one: http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12860
Hi Folks, First, many thanks to the developers of ISPConfig...a really great package. I too would like to see clamd and clamdscan supported by ISPConfig and I think it is important. I would also like to see the SaneSecurity stuff supported as well. Yes, I already have clamd/clamdscan and SaneSecurity signatures implemented. They seem to work great and I've not had any obvious problems. I use a Centos 5 base OS and I have notes that I will post to my web site one of these days or will make available upon request. However, the installation/configuration seems to break with an ISPConfig update which makes it all of dubious value to me. Could we, at a minimum, support it/them enough to survive the next update of ISPConfig? Thanks for listening, G
