imap connections from 127.0.0.1

Discussion in 'General' started by dranach, Nov 17, 2011.

  1. dranach

    dranach New Member

    I have two servers on which I have installed ISPConfig3, one not yet updated (still 3.0.3) and the other with a fresh install of 3.0.4.

    I followed the howto-tutorial to install both servers.
    OS is Debian Squeeze.

    Both have domains and e-mail configured on them.

    When I look in the logs (generated by logwatch), I see regular connections from public addresses to imap (both on 3.0.3 and on 3.0.4).

    But on the server with v3.0.4 I also see lots of connections from 127.0.0.1 (something like over 500 connections from 127.0.0.1 on one e-mail address in the past 3 hours). I know for a fact that this particular user doesn't use imap.

    Is this something I should worry about? If this is normal, can somebody give an explanation of what's going on?

    Toni
     
  2. till

    till Super Moderator Staff Member ISPConfig Developer

    Do you have webmail installed? If yes, then these connections are most likely from a webmail session as webmail connacts to imap on 127.0.0.1 and does a lot of cennects.

    If you see just connect from 127.0.0.1 without a login and then a disconnect every 5 minutes, then the connects are from the ispconfig system monitor.
     
  3. dranach

    dranach New Member

    Indeed, I have webmail.
    I replaced Squirrelmail with Roundcubemail.

    But still there is a difference between one server where there are on one hand no imap-connections at all from 127.0.0.1 but a very strong use of imap by email clients, and on the other hand a server where there are lots of connections from 127.0.0.1 but no imap use from e-mail clients (mostly pop3).

    Actually, I don't know if there is a correlation in the behaviour I describe above, but it strikes me as odd..

    Although everything seems to work as it should, though.
     
  4. till

    till Super Moderator Staff Member ISPConfig Developer

    I dont think that there is something wrong with that.
     
  5. dranach

    dranach New Member

    Ok,

    But, I'll keep a close(r) eye on it anyway :)
     

Share This Page