Does any one here use the non-default partitioning scheme on their servers? If so, I was wondering what sizes you had for partitions. Just curious because I noticed that all the perfect sets have you select the default partitioning scheme.
I'm actually just curious what sizes people use for partitions. Personally, I'd like to seperate out a couple of mine at some point, but it is pretty low on my to do list. Partitions I was thinking about using were: /home - Enabling Quota, and setting to fill the volume /var/log - Set at a hard size limit (not yet determined) /tmp - Size limit again, possibly adding noexec permissions. I'm not sure how this would affect some of my software though. I haven't had time to test this one) /var/www - Maybe, though if I do, I'd split out my databases too, to be on faster drives and another logical volume. / - Everything that I don't need special mount options on would then fall under here I created the topic more to generate some discussion on various paritioning schemes than to ask for advice on sizes of particular partitions - though I would welcome it.
I'd make / 5GB at least. /home and /var/www should be your biggest partitions, depending on whart you want to store in it. /tmp and /var/log don't need to be big (unless you expect very big log files), 5GB each should do.
For a Webserver (ISPConfig) do you use a large home partition? Or just a large www partition? Do you use the noexec option on your tmp space (or any partitions) or is it not worth using?
ISPConfig 2 (don't know about 3) doesn't store user's files in /home. Only what's stored there after ISPConfig installation so /var/www should have more space. Sooner or later we can end up with a problem when our disks run out of space. Then we can buy a new one and copy the files to a bigger partition. Another potentially good way to deal with problems like that is LVM (Logical Volume Management),which lets You add new drives/partitions that would be seen as one big drive/partition.
Well storing user's files and folders doesn't make it less sensible. It's just a decision the developers made while writing ISPConfig.
I've always used LVM on any PC (server, desltop, or laptop) that I install Linux on. It stops you from worryiing about running out of disk space. Regardless of the the system you are installing, always use LVM.