Should Step 9 now be "Install Rspamd, SpamAssassin..."?

Discussion in 'Installation/Configuration' started by fluidmindorg, Sep 11, 2019.

Tags:
  1. fluidmindorg

    fluidmindorg New Member

    Hi all.

    I'm just now installing a new Debian 10 VM with ISPConfig 3.1.15. The blog post from Sep 4th about the 3.1.15 release says that Rspamd "replaces amavis as the default spam filter in ISPConfig". The installation instructions, however, still say to install amavisd-new in Step 9. Should that be changed to rspamd?

    Thanks
    —Dan
     
    fluidmindorg, Sep 11, 2019
    #1
  2. till

    till Super Moderator Staff Member ISPConfig Developer

    We will update tutorials in the next weeks to use rspamd. Amavisd is still fully supported, so the existing guides are working fine.
     
    till, Sep 11, 2019
    #2
  3. fluidmindorg

    fluidmindorg New Member

    Thanks Till.
    So it is safe to assume that I can just replace "amavisd-new" with "rspamd" in that long apt-get install command in Step 9?
     
    fluidmindorg, Sep 11, 2019
    #3
  4. till

    till Super Moderator Staff Member ISPConfig Developer

    till, Sep 11, 2019
    #4
  5. fluidmindorg

    fluidmindorg New Member

    Cool. That worked fine. Thanks.
    Since I'm just now installing this box, should I use unbound instead of bind9? Is unbound going to be the standard name server for ISPConfig from now on?
     
    fluidmindorg, Sep 11, 2019
    #5
  6. till

    till Super Moderator Staff Member ISPConfig Developer

    No, unbound is not a DNS server, it's a dns proxy. If you would skip bind, then you would not be able to manage DNS in ISPConfig.
     
    till, Sep 11, 2019
    #6
  7. fluidmindorg

    fluidmindorg New Member

    Dig it. Thanks!
     
    fluidmindorg, Sep 11, 2019
    #7

Share This Page