Recent Activity

devops_mustafa replied to the thread pure-ftp - Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost'.

2025 update. I had this issue while trying to connect ftp, my username was passing but not password. and i got constantly 530 error. I...

remkoh replied to the thread [Solved] Incorrect "Node not up-to-date".

Also on every node "cronjob_monitor_sys_usage" seemed to be hanging since last evening. In hindsight not strange at all. The node in...

remkoh replied to the thread [Solved] Incorrect "Node not up-to-date".

Right on the money! As always :D Thanks a million.

till replied to the thread [Solved] Incorrect "Node not up-to-date".

Check the sys_cron table in the dbispconfig database on the affected nodes. Are there any records in the state running? Maybe they got...

remkoh replied to the thread [Solved] Incorrect "Node not up-to-date".

Nothing, as expected. Listing... Done There is only a notification of a few Ubuntu Pro esm-apps security updates when running "apt...

pyte replied to the thread [Solved] Incorrect "Node not up-to-date".

Well you could have mentioned that fact :D Does "apt list --upgradable" list anything on the host in question?

remkoh replied to the thread [Solved] Incorrect "Node not up-to-date".

I know it takes a while. But not almost 24hrs. That's why I posted now and not shortly after the upgrade.

pyte replied to the thread [Solved] Incorrect "Node not up-to-date".

It takes a while, just relax and wait for a bit :-) IIRC that info is fetched not that regular.

pyte replied to the thread Email do not reach destination... (date missing?).

The Authentication-Results header does not contain a date at all. Nowhere in the spec is defined that this header should hold a date....

remkoh posted a new thread.

[Solved] Incorrect "Node not up-to-date"

Several nodes that were still running Ubuntu 22.04 have been upgraded to 24.04. All went fine and is still functioning properly except...

Forum: ISPConfig 3 Priority Support

remkoh replied to the thread "v=spf1 mx ~all" versus "v=spf1 mx -all".

Depends on if you're in full control of everything domain related regarding the domain in question. When it's a domain of a customer of...

nhybgtvfr replied to the thread "v=spf1 mx ~all" versus "v=spf1 mx -all".

start with ~all yes, it'll still allow other servers to send mail. but they should get marked as suspicious in some way. then, as...

till liked karuott's post in the thread Custom Apache Directive not working.

Just fyi, got it work with these Apache Directives: DocumentRoot {DOCROOT_CLIENT}/public <Directory {DOCROOT_CLIENT}/public>...

remkoh replied to the thread "v=spf1 mx ~all" versus "v=spf1 mx -all".

SPF is for receivers of mail from your domain to verify if it's coming from a trusted server. In short, to prevent spammers being able...

natanfelles posted a new thread.

"v=spf1 mx ~all" versus "v=spf1 mx -all"

Hello! I'm new to email setup and today I want to setup SPF DNS record. I've already read this article: -...

Forum: Server Operation